Does the length of time of testicular shutdown negatively affect your future chances of regaining function? For example, if I want kids in 15 years while never coming off exogenous testosterone. Is it better to only deploy the fertility protocol in 15 years? Or use HCG maybe once a year? I’m scared of permanent shutdown and not doing anything now just to keep them somewhat active. Thanks
Based on your previous video about the potential concerns of the rodent study on constant down-regulation + HCG signalling could = Less response to the fertility drugs when we need them?
I wouldnt feel confident answering 100% in either direction here. All we do know is HCG works when its needed & I am yet to see examples of permanent shut down from AAS use.
Turning it back on (so to speak) then turning it off again, doesn’t really make much logical sense, but if that was something you wanted to do, I couldn’t over a bulletproof rationale against it.
With that rodent study, that was only one example, and not enough evidence to suggest less response. My only concern would be consistent use, when we have a very strong signal for shutting us down.
Does the length of time of testicular shutdown negatively affect your future chances of regaining function? For example, if I want kids in 15 years while never coming off exogenous testosterone. Is it better to only deploy the fertility protocol in 15 years? Or use HCG maybe once a year? I’m scared of permanent shutdown and not doing anything now just to keep them somewhat active. Thanks
Based on your previous video about the potential concerns of the rodent study on constant down-regulation + HCG signalling could = Less response to the fertility drugs when we need them?
I wouldnt feel confident answering 100% in either direction here. All we do know is HCG works when its needed & I am yet to see examples of permanent shut down from AAS use.
Turning it back on (so to speak) then turning it off again, doesn’t really make much logical sense, but if that was something you wanted to do, I couldn’t over a bulletproof rationale against it.
With that rodent study, that was only one example, and not enough evidence to suggest less response. My only concern would be consistent use, when we have a very strong signal for shutting us down.
F8bet05…another betting site, I reckon. Need to see what their odds are like, and if they actually pay out. Worth a look: f8bet05
bbjlslotapp.net… alright, might give it a shot, see if it’s worth the storage space. Let’s get it a whirl! bbjlslotapp
Yo, just used dangnhap188bet to get in! Super easy, no hassle. Finally back to the game. Check it out here: dangnhap188bet